Related Obligations
Obligation | Description | Effective | Category | Audit Point Adopted | Audit Point Definition | ARPt2 Inclusion | CMR Inclusion | Average Score (%) | When Evaluated |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMM 2009-03 01 |
Limit number of vessels fishing for SWO south of 20S to the number in any one year between 2000-2005
Theme:
Quantitative limits for tuna and billfish
Sub Theme:
Swordfish vessel and catch limits
|
11 Dec 2009 - Current | QL | Yes | The CCM reported in AR Pt2 its total number of flagged vessels fishing for SWO south of 20S and the Secretariat can verify the CCM’s reported catch level and confirm that the CCM’s allowable limit has not been exceeded. | Yes | Yes | 98 |
2022 2021 2020 2016 2014 2013 |
CMM 2009-03 02 |
Limit the catch of SWO by its vessels in area south of 20S to the amount in any one year during 2000-2006
Theme:
Quantitative limits for tuna and billfish
Sub Theme:
Swordfish vessel and catch limits
|
11 Dec 2009 - Current | QL | Yes | The CCM reported in AR Pt2 its total catch of SWO by its flagged vessels in the area south of 20S and the Secretariat can verify the CCM’s reported catch level and confirm that the CCM’s allowable limit has not been exceeded. | Yes | Yes | 97 |
2022 2021 2020 2016 2014 2013 |
CMM 2009-03 03 |
CCMs shall not shift their fishing effort for SWO to the area north of 20°S
Theme:
Quantitative limits for tuna and billfish
Sub Theme:
Swordfish vessel and catch limits
|
11 Dec 2009 - Current | QL | No | Yes | No | 97 |
2016 2014 2013 |
|
CMM 2009-03 03 |
CCMs shall not shift their fishing effort for SWO to the area north of 20°S
Theme:
Quantitative limits for tuna and billfish
Sub Theme:
Swordfish vessel and catch limits
|
11 Dec 2009 - Current | IM | Yes | 1. CCM submitted a statement in AR Pt2 that: a. confirms CCM’s implementation through adoption of a national binding measure that ensures that CCM flagged vessels do not shift effort (for swordfish) to the area north of 20S b. describes how it is monitoring its flagged vessels to ensure they do not shift effort for SWO to the area north of 20S and how the CCM responds to potential infringements or instances of non-compliance with this requirement. 2. The Secretariat can verify that the CCM’s flagged vessels have not shifted effort to the area north of 20S. | Yes | No | 100 |
2022 2021 2020 |
CMM 2009-03 04 |
CCMs shall nominate a maximum catch limit for the area S20S
Theme:
Quantitative limits for tuna and billfish
Sub Theme:
Swordfish vessel and catch limits
|
11 Dec 2009 - Current | RP | No | No | No | |||
CMM 2009-03 08 |
Report annually the number of vessels that fished for SWO and total catch of SWO S20S
Theme:
Quantitative limits for tuna and billfish
Sub Theme:
Swordfish vessel and catch limits
|
11 Dec 2009 - Current | DL | No | No | No | 88 |
2016 2014 2013 |
|
CMM 2009-03 08 |
Report annually the number of vessels that fished for SWO and total catch of SWO S20S
Theme:
Quantitative limits for tuna and billfish
Sub Theme:
Swordfish vessel and catch limits
|
11 Dec 2009 - Current | RP | Yes | The Secretariat confirms that the CCM submitted the required information contained in the template in Annex 2 of CMM in its AR Pt 1. | No | No | 99 |
2022 2021 2020 2016 2014 2013 |