Status: Active
Effective From
Scientific Data to be Provided to the Commission (revised at WCPFC4, 6, 7, 9, 10, 13 and 19)
Related Obligations
| Obligation | Description | Effective | Category | Audit Point Adopted | Audit Point Definition | ARPt2 Inclusion | CMR Inclusion | Average Score (%) | When Evaluated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SciData 01 |
Estimates of Annual Catches
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | DL | No | No | No | 98 |
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 |
|
| SciData 01 |
Estimates of Annual Catches
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | RP | Yes | Assessment is in accordance with Tier-Scoring Evaluation Level: • A Tier Score of III = COMPLIANT III:=Data have been provided, there are no gaps in the data provided and the coverage of data is according to the requirements. • A Tier Score of I or II = NON-COMPLIANT/PRIORITY I:=No data are provided, or data have been provided but they have been evaluated as ‘unusable’ (instances where none of the data provided can be used in assessments). This level of data gap is the most severe and has by far the greatest impacts on the scientific work of the Commission. II:=Data have been provided, most of which can be used for the scientific work of the Commission, but (i) there are one or several (minimum-standard) data fields not provided an/or (ii) the coverage of the data is not according to the requirements. In these cases, some of the scientific work of the Commission cannot be undertaken. The % value assigned in this category represents the estimated proportion of the key attribute data provided compared to the full set of key attribute data required as stipulated in the WCPFC data submission guidelines. | No | Yes | 97 |
2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 |
| SciData 01-05, 07 |
Scientific Data to be Provided Decision
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | No | No | No | ||||
| SciData 02 |
Number of vessels active
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | DL | No | No | No | 97 |
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 |
|
| SciData 02 |
Number of vessels active
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | RP | Yes | Assessment is in accordance with Tier-Scoring Evaluation Level: • A Tier Score of III = COMPLIANT III:=Data have been provided, there are no gaps in the data provided and the coverage of data is according to the requirements. • A Tier Score of I or II = NON-COMPLIANT/PRIORITY I:=No data are provided, or data have been provided but they have been evaluated as ‘unusable’ (instances where none of the data provided can be used in assessments). This level of data gap is the most severe and has by far the greatest impacts on the scientific work of the Commission. II:=Data have been provided, most of which can be used for the scientific work of the Commission, but (i) there are one or several (minimum-standard) data fields not provided an/or (ii) the coverage of the data is not according to the requirements. In these cases, some of the scientific work of the Commission cannot be undertaken. The % value assigned in this category represents the estimated proportion of the key attribute data provided compared to the full set of key attribute data required as stipulated in the WCPFC data submission guidelines. | No | Yes | 98 |
2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 |
| SciData 03 |
Operational Level Catch and Effort Data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | DL | No | No | No | 99 |
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 |
|
| SciData 03 |
Operational Level Catch and Effort Data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | RP | Yes | Assessment is in accordance with Tier-Scoring Evaluation Level: • A Tier Score of III = COMPLIANT III:=Data have been provided, there are no gaps in the data provided and the coverage of data is according to the requirements. • A Tier Score of I or II = NON-COMPLIANT/PRIORITY I:=No data are provided, or data have been provided but they have been evaluated as ‘unusable’ (instances where none of the data provided can be used in assessments). This level of data gap is the most severe and has by far the greatest impacts on the scientific work of the Commission. II:=Data have been provided, most of which can be used for the scientific work of the Commission, but (i) there are one or several (minimum-standard) data fields not provided an/or (ii) the coverage of the data is not according to the requirements. In these cases, some of the scientific work of the Commission cannot be undertaken. The % value assigned in this category represents the estimated proportion of the key attribute data provided compared to the full set of key attribute data required as stipulated in the WCPFC data submission guidelines. | No | Yes | 99 |
2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 |
| SciData 04 |
Catch and effort data aggregated by time period and geographic area
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | DL | No | No | No | 96 |
2014 2013 |
|
| SciData 04 |
Catch and effort data aggregated by time period and geographic area
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | RP | No | No | No | 84 |
2014 2013 |
|
| SciData 05 |
Size composition data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | DL | No | No | No | 92 |
2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 |
|
| SciData 05 |
Size composition data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | RP | Yes | Assessment is in accordance with Tier-Scoring Evaluation Level: • A Tier Score of III = COMPLIANT III:=Data have been provided, there are no gaps in the data provided and the coverage of data is according to the requirements. • A Tier Score of I or II = NON-COMPLIANT/PRIORITY I:=No data are provided, or data have been provided but they have been evaluated as ‘unusable’ (instances where none of the data provided can be used in assessments). This level of data gap is the most severe and has by far the greatest impacts on the scientific work of the Commission. II:=Data have been provided, most of which can be used for the scientific work of the Commission, but (i) there are one or several (minimum-standard) data fields not provided an/or (ii) the coverage of the data is not according to the requirements. In these cases, some of the scientific work of the Commission cannot be undertaken. The % value assigned in this category represents the estimated proportion of the key attribute data provided compared to the full set of key attribute data required as stipulated in the WCPFC data submission guidelines. | No | Yes | 94 |
2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 |
| SciData 07 |
Time periods covered and schedule for the provision of data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | DL | No | No | No | 100 |
2014 |
|
| SciData 07 |
Time periods covered and schedule for the provision of data
Theme:
Activity related requirement
Sub Theme:
Annual fishing activity reporting
|
06 Feb 2013 - Current | RP | No | No | No | 100 |
2014 |